News

  • Belarus’ UPR in 2020 and 2025: What Changed in the Recommendations and the State’s Response

    The conclusion of the third cycle of the Universal Periodic Review (2020–2025) and the beginning of the fourth (2025–2030) took place amid a significant decline in the State’s cooperation with international human rights mechanisms. As a result, the UPR has become particularly important as one of the few universal forums in which Belarus continues to participate in international dialogue on human rights. //
  • Belarusian authorities have designated the Belarusian Helsinki Committee as an “extremist formation.”

    Any interaction with the organization (including social media engagement, seeking assistance, or participating in educational activities) may be considered a violation. There is a risk of criminal liability. The law is applied broadly and allows for arbitrary interpretation. If you have interacted with the Belarusian Helsinki Committee, please take steps to ensure your safety. //
  • cover for Index

    Belarus Human Rights Index: 2025 Results

    Spoiler: For the first time in seven years, the overall Index score has not declined compared to the previous year. However, this does not mean that the human rights situation has stabilized. Rather, it reflects the effect of approaching the lower limit of the scale. //
  • logo

    Amendments to the Code of Administrative Offences: What They Mean for LGBTQ+ People and the Childfree

    Belarus has introduced administrative liability for the “propaganda of homosexual relations, gender transition, and childlessness”. The Belarusian Helsinki Committee and the queer initiative Prismatica explain the potential legal implications for individuals and organisations. //
  • logo

    Statement by the Human Rights Coalition regarding the designation of PEN Belarus, Human Constanta, and the Belarusian Helsinki Committee as extremist formations

    By criminalizing human rights activity, the authorities create intolerable conditions for practicing this profession. This constitutes a violation of the right to work of human rights defenders as a professional group, particularly the freedom to choose one’s occupation as guaranteed by the International Covenant on Economic, Social and Cultural Rights. Such actions effectively amount to a ban on the profession.At the same time, this form of persecution against organizations operating in exile is part of a pattern of transnational repression. //
  • Pages